UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
Commission File Number: 000-50470
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as Specified in its Charter)
|
Delaware |
|
84-1561463 |
|
(State or
Other Jurisdiction of
|
|
(Internal
Revenue Service
|
|
|
|
|
|
1444 Wazee Street, Suite 210,
|
|
80202 |
|
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (720) 946-6440
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $.0001 par value per share
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company x |
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes o No x
As of November 13, 2008, the registrant had 17,748,293 shares of its common stock ($.0001 par value) outstanding.
2
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 (UNAUDITED) AND DECEMBER 31, 2007
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
3
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007
(unaudited)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
4
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007
(unaudited)
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(9,255,175 |
) |
$ |
(4,344,180 |
) |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Gain on value of derivative liabilities |
|
(3,887,027 |
) |
(4,558,625 |
) |
||
|
Amortization of debt discount |
|
1,353,776 |
|
2,180,882 |
|
||
|
Fair value of adjustment to exercise price of convertible debt and warrants |
|
6,450,384 |
|
1,958,987 |
|
||
|
Noncash stock compensation expense |
|
1,212,383 |
|
761,052 |
|
||
|
Fair value of warrants issued for amending debt agreements |
|
920,091 |
|
275,600 |
|
||
|
Depreciation expense |
|
8,930 |
|
7,252 |
|
||
|
Amortization of debt placement costs |
|
|
|
440,304 |
|
||
|
Increase in accounts receivable |
|
(95,182 |
) |
|
|
||
|
Increase in prepaid expenses and other |
|
(38,807 |
) |
(21,070 |
) |
||
|
Increase in inventory |
|
(258,661 |
) |
|
|
||
|
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
337,413 |
|
(99,791 |
) |
||
|
Increase in deferred revenue |
|
2,437,228 |
|
|
|
||
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
(814,647 |
) |
(3,399,589 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Purchase of property and equipment |
|
(7,052 |
) |
(3,043 |
) |
||
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(7,052 |
) |
(3,043 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Payments under promissory notes to Osmotics |
|
(50,000 |
) |
|
|
||
|
Repayments from Osmotics under promissory note |
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
||
|
Net proceeds from the exercise of warrants |
|
|
|
16,883 |
|
||
|
Borrowings under insurance financing agreement |
|
84,434 |
|
88,974 |
|
||
|
Payments under insurance financing agreement |
|
(51,568 |
) |
(55,302 |
) |
||
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
7,866 |
|
50,555 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
(813,833 |
) |
(3,352,077 |
) |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period |
|
2,213,654 |
|
4,997,945 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
|
$ |
1,399,821 |
|
$ |
1,645,868 |
|
5
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 AND 2007
(unaudited)
(Contd)
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
Nine Months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
Cash paid during period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Interest |
|
$ |
482,982 |
|
$ |
408,914 |
|
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF NON CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
Nine Months ended September 30, |
|
||||
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Conversion of debt to common stock |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
179,828 |
|
|
Debt discount converted to additional paid in capital |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
42,412 |
|
|
Debt placement costs converted to additional paid in capital |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
13,112 |
|
|
Derivative liability converted to additional paid in capital |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
64,800 |
|
|
Conversion of accrued interest to common stock |
|
$ |
40,000 |
|
$ |
75,919 |
|
|
Common stock issued for service agreement |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
122,000 |
|
|
Preferred stock issued for services |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
843,750 |
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock and accrued dividends into common stock |
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accrued interest converted to debt |
|
$ |
220,651 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Accrual of preferred stock dividends |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
6
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (DEFICIT)
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
Shares |
|
Amount |
|
APIC |
|
Deficit |
|
Total |
|
||||||
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2007 |
|
1,000,000 |
|
$ |
|
|
375,000 |
|
$ |
843,750 |
|
16,393,724 |
|
$ |
1,639 |
|
$ |
17,299,917 |
|
$ |
(24,883,658 |
) |
$ |
(6,738,352 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
|
Stock option compensation expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
642,851 |
|
|
|
642,851 |
|
||||||
|
Conversion of Preferred Stock and accrued dividends into common stock |
|
(1,000,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,304,569 |
|
131 |
|
239,869 |
|
|
|
240,000 |
|
||||||
|
Conversion of accrued interest into common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000 |
|
5 |
|
39,995 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
||||||
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,255,175 |
) |
(9,255,175 |
) |
||||||
|
Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
|
|
(80,000 |
) |
||||||
|
BALANCES, September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
375,000 |
|
$ |
843,750 |
|
17,748,293 |
|
$ |
1,775 |
|
$ |
18,142,632 |
|
$ |
(34,138,833 |
) |
$ |
(15,150,676 |
) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
7
CERAGENIX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(UNAUDITED)
(1) BUSINESS AND OVERVIEW
Ceragenix Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the Company) is an emerging medical device company focused on dermatology and infectious disease. We have two base technology platforms each with multiple applications: Barrier Repair and Ceragenins (also known as cationic steroid antibiotics or CSAs). We believe that the Barrier Repair platform represents near term revenue opportunities for prescription skin care products to treat a variety of skin disorders all characterized by a disrupted skin barrier. In April 2006, we received clearance from the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to market EpiCeram® our first commercial product using the Barrier Repair technology. EpiCeram® is a prescription-only topical cream intended to treat dry skin conditions and to manage and relieve the burning and itching associated with various types of dermatoses including eczema, irritant contact dermatitis, and radiation dermatitis. All of these conditions share in common a defective or incomplete skin barrier function. In November 2007, we entered into an exclusive distribution and supply agreement with Dr. Reddys Laboratories, Inc. (DRL) for the commercialization of EpiCeram® in the United States (the DRL Agreement). Under the terms of the DRL Agreement, we will be responsible for manufacturing (through a contract manufacturer) and supplying the product while DRL will be responsible for distribution, marketing and sales. During September 2008, we shipped the first commercial quantities of EpiCeram® to DRL and DRL officially launched sales and marketing efforts during October 2008.
Our Ceragenin technology represents a mid- and long-term revenue opportunity for treating infectious disease. Ceragenins are small molecule, positively charged, aminosterol compounds that have shown activity against both gram negative and gram positive bacteria, certain viruses, certain fungi and certain cancers in preclinical testing. These patented compounds mimic the activity of the naturally occurring antimicrobial peptides that form the bodys innate immune system. We are initially pursuing activities in antimicrobial medical device coatings. We have not applied for, nor have we received, approval from the FDA to market any product using our Ceragenin technology.
(2) GOING CONCERN, MANAGEMENTS PLANS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Going Concern and Managements Plans
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. Since our inception in February 2002, we have incurred significant cash and operating losses and at September 30, 2008, we had a stockholders deficit of $15,150,676 and a working capital balance of $1,108,987. We have relied upon proceeds from the sale of convertible debt securities, proceeds received from the exercise of common stock purchase warrants, and milestone payments from the DRL Agreement to fund our operations. In order to commercialize the majority of our planned products in the U.S., we will require marketing clearance from the FDA. To date, we have received clearance to market one product, EpiCeram®.
As of September 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of $1,399,821. As previously noted, in November 2007, we entered into the DRL Agreement for the commercialization of EpiCeram® in the United States. Upon execution of the DRL Agreement, we received $1,500,000. Additionally, the DRL Agreement calls for DRL to pay us certain non-sales based milestone payments upon the accomplishment of three specified events (the Non-Sales Milestones) of up to $3,500,000 which amount is inclusive of certain product launch specific considerations. As of September 30, 2008, we had received $2,500,000 in Non-Sales Milestone payments. As previously disclosed, we expected to receive the remaining $1,000,000 Non-Sales Milestone payment during the fourth quarter of 2008. While we believe that we have satisfied the conditions necessary for receiving the payment, DRL does not believe the conditions have been met. We are currently in discussions with DRL to resolve the issue. We can provide no assurance that the matter will be resolved in a timely manner. Additionally, under the DRL Agreement, we can earn up to $21,250,000 in milestone payments based on cumulative net sales of EpiCeram® and the satisfaction of other performance requirements (the Net Sales Milestones). However, we will not receive any Net Sales Milestone payments during 2008 nor do we anticipate earning any payments during 2009.
We believe that existing cash on hand in combination with projected operating cash flows should be sufficient to fund our planned corporate activities, all current contractual obligations and planned development activities through at least the middle of the first quarter of 2009. In the event that we receive the remaining Non-Sales Milestone payment, our existing cash on hand will be
8
sufficient to last through at least the middle of the second quarter of 2009. Accordingly, we will require additional funding within the next six months. As of the date of this Form 10-Q, we have no firm commitments for raising additional capital and as described further below, our ability to access the capital markets may be severely limited.
As described further below in Note 3, during the quarter ended September 30, 2008, we negotiated amendments to our existing convertible debt securities (collectively the Amended Convertible Debt Agreements). These debt agreements were previously in technical default. Among other things, the Amended Convertible Debt Agreements extend the maturity date of the debt to December 31, 2011 and require that we make minimum quarterly payments to the holders commencing June 30, 2009 (the Amended Amortization Schedule) solely from the following revenue streams (the Dedicated Revenue Streams):
· 100% of net revenues (as defined in the amendment) paid or owed to us under the DRL Agreement subsequent to April 1, 2009;
· 100% of net revenue received from any other EpiCeram® commercialization arrangements;
· 50% of the net revenue received from the sale of NeoCeram;
· 33% of any net revenue received from Ceragenin commercialization arrangements; and
· 33% of any net revenue received by us in excess of $250,000 in aggregate excluding any capital raised by the Company through equity investment or the issuance of debt.
In the event that the Dedicated Revenue Streams are insufficient to make a quarterly interest payment in full, the only remedies to the holders are to add the unpaid accrued interest to the outstanding debt balance or receive shares of our common stock in lieu of cash payment. Additionally, in the event that the Dedicated Revenue Streams are not sufficient to make the cumulative payments required by the Amended Amortization Schedule with respect to the 12-month periods ending June 30, 2010 and 2011, then the only remedy to the holders is to have the conversion price of the debt and exercise price of their warrants adjusted downward. See Note 3 for a more detailed discussion. Accordingly, until December 31, 2011, the failure to make scheduled interest and/or principal payments in full does not provide the holders the ability to declare the Company in default.
While we believe that the Amended Convertible Debt Agreements are more favorable to the Company than the original convertible debt agreements, there are a number of factors which could inhibit the Companys ability to raise additional capital. These may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
· The presence of $8,822,840 in secured convertible debt with most favored nation and other pricing protection;
· The Dedicated Revenue Streams will reduce future cash flows retained by the Company for operations;
· 12,004,569 shares of our common stock (or approximately 68% of our issued and outstanding shares) are currently held in escrow for Osmotics Corporation (Osmotics) awaiting exchange with its shareholders. Osmotics has advised us that it must complete its exchange transaction by November 5, 2010 in order to preserve the tax free nature of the transaction;
· Limitations on our ability to register common shares and common shares underlying convertible debt securities sold in private placement transactions (see a more detailed discussion in Note 2 to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2008);
· Our lack of an operating history and profitable operations; and
· The recent turbulence and uncertainty in the U.S. financial markets.
There is no assurance that we will be able to raise additional capital within the timeframe described above. Even if we are successful, it could be on terms that substantially dilute our current shareholders. In the event that we cannot raise sufficient capital within the required timeframe, it will have a material adverse effect on the Companys liquidity, financial condition and business prospects.
9
Basis of Presentation
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Ceragenix Corporation. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. For the periods prior to September 30, 2008, the Company was classified as a development stage company in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 7, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared without audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring entries), which in the opinion of management, are necessary to present fairly the financial position at September 30, 2008 and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2008.
The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys audited financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2007, which are included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
(3) CONVERTIBLE DEBT
A description of the terms of the Companys convertible debt is as follows:
2006 Debentures
In December 2006, we sold in a private transaction an aggregate of $5,000,000 of convertible debentures (the 2006 Debentures). The principal amount of the 2006 Debentures outstanding accrued interest at the rate of 9% per annum payable quarterly. The 2006 Debentures, as adjusted, were convertible into shares of our common stock at the equivalent of $.96 per common share, subject to adjustments more fully described below. Beginning July 1, 2008, the 2006 Debentures required mandatory monthly redemptions at a rate of 1/25 of the face amount of the debt with the outstanding principal and accrued interest payable on December 5, 2009.
On July 1, 2008, we executed an amendment agreement (the Third Amendment) with a majority of the holders of the 2006 Debentures which extended the commencement date for making the first mandatory redemption payment to July 18, 2008. The purpose of this amendment was to allow sufficient time to complete negotiations and documentation of an additional amendment (the Fourth Amendment) that would more substantively amend the terms of the debt. We paid no consideration for the Third Amendment. On September 25, 2008, we executed the Fourth Amendment which is dated August 20, 2008 and effective July 18, 2008. The Fourth Amendment modified the 2006 Debentures as follows:
· Extended the maturity date of the debt to December 31, 2011;
· Adjusted the conversion price of the debt to $.80 per common share (subject to adjustments described below);
· Increased the interest rate to 12% per annum;
· Deferred payment of accrued interest to June 30, 2009. Accrued interest for the period from July 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009 is to be added to the 2006 Debenture principal balance;
· Adjusted the exercise price of the 2006 Debenture Warrants (defined below) and the First Amendment Warrants (defined below) to $.80 per common share (subject to adjustments described below);
· Changed the redemption requirement from a monthly payment beginning July 1, 2008 to a quarterly redemption requirement beginning June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Redemption Amounts) ;
· Established the Dedicated Revenue Streams as the sole required source for making the Quarterly Redemption Amounts; and
10
· Established certain other covenants intended to reduce the Companys cash requirements.
As additional consideration for the Fourth Amendment, the Company issued new five-year warrants to the holders giving them the right to purchase up to 1,718,750 shares of the Companys common stock at an initial exercise price of $.80 per share (subject to adjustment) (the Fourth Amendment Warrants).
In the event that we fail to pay interest in full on any due date, the holder shall have the option to receive the unpaid balance in shares of common stock at a price equal to 85% of the average of the 5 lowest Volume Weighted Average Prices (VWAPs) during any 30 consecutive trading day periods during the 365 day period immediately prior to the interest payment date or, in lieu of receiving shares of common stock, may add such unpaid interest to the outstanding principal amount of the 2006 Debentures.
In the event that we fail to pay the cumulative Quarterly Redemption Amounts during any 12-month period ending June 30, 2010 and June 30, 2011, then the conversion price of the 2006 Debentures shall be reduced each July 1, 2010 and July 1, 2011, respectively, to the lesser of (i) the then conversion price or (ii) the average of the 10 lowest VWAPs for the 60 consecutive trading day period immediately prior.
We evaluated the Fourth Amendment in the context of the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue 96-19 Debtors Accounting for a Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments (EITF 96-19). Pursuant to the guidance of EITF 96-19, an amendment is considered a major modification if the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the amended debt instrument are greater than 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. Based on our analysis, the Fourth Amendment was not considered a major modification of the debt.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded the fair value of the Fourth Amendment as a charge to interest expense and a corresponding increase to derivative liability on the accompanying condensed financial statements. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value. The fair value of the Fourth Amendment is comprised of the following:
|
Fourth Amendment Warrants |
|
$ |
708,125 |
|
|
Reduction in conversion price of 2006 Debentures |
|
1,436,875 |
|
|
|
Reduction in exercise price of 2006 Debenture Warrants and First Amendment Warrants |
|
424,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,569,983 |
|
Under certain circumstances, we can force the conversion of the 2006 Debentures. However, the 2006 Debentures contain a provision that prohibits the holder from converting the debenture if such conversion would result in the holder owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such conversion, which limitation may be waived by the holder under certain conditions to not more than 9.99% . The conversion price of the 2006 Debentures may be adjusted downward in the event that we issue or grant any right to common stock at a price below the conversion price of the 2006 Debentures including a reduction in the price of the Convertible Notes (see more information on the Convertible Notes under the heading Convertible Notes below). A reduction in the conversion price of the 2006 Debentures also triggers a reduction in the exercise price of all warrants held by the holders of the 2006 Debentures. Our obligation to repay the 2006 Debentures is secured by a first lien security interest on all of our tangible and intangible assets. Holders of the 2006 Debentures have no voting, preemptive, or other rights of shareholders.
Events of default under the 2006 Debentures include; failure to make a redemption or interest payment as scheduled; a breach of a material covenant not cured within five days of written notice or within 10 days after the Company has become or should become aware of such failure; if a default or event of default (subject to any grace or cure periods provided in the applicable agreement) shall occur under any documents that is part of the transaction or any other material agreement, lease, document or instrument to which the Company or any subsidiary is obligated; a breach of any material representations and warranties; the Company or any subsidiary is subject to a bankruptcy event (as defined in the debenture); the Company defaults on any indebtedness in excess of $150,000 which results in such indebtedness becoming or declared due and payable prior to the date it would otherwise become due and payable; a delisting of our common stock or a stop trade action by the SEC that lasts for more than five consecutive days; if the Company shall be party to a change of control transaction (as defined in the debenture) or if the Company shall agree to sell or dispose of 40% of its assets in one related transaction or a series of related transactions; if a registration statement shall not be declared effective by the SEC within 180 days after closing the transaction; if the effectiveness of the registration statement lapses for any reason or the holders shall not be permitted to resell registrable securities (as defined in the debenture) under the registration statement for a period of more than 25 consecutive trading days or 35 non-consecutive trading days during any 12 month period; if the Company shall fail for any reason to deliver certificates to a holder prior to the fifth trading day after a conversion date; or a monetary judgment in excess of $50,000 is filed against the Company that is not cured within 45 days.
11
Purchasers of the 2006 Debentures received warrants exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 1,162,212 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.37 per share (the 2006 Debenture Warrants), but as discussed both above and below, the exercise price and number of shares underlying the warrants have been adjusted several times. As a result of these adjustments, the exercise price of the 2006 Debenture warrants has been reduced to $.80 per share and the number of common shares underlying the warrants has been increased to 3,443,053.
We also issued to placement agents warrants exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 154,867 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.26 per share (the Agent Warrants) and paid them cash commissions of $425,000.
The 2006 Debentures originally required the monthly redemption payments to commence on December 1, 2007. On November 30, 2007, the holders of the 2006 Debentures agreed to amend the terms of the debentures to extend the first monthly redemption payment date to the earlier of (i) June 30, 2008 or (ii) the date that we receive in excess of $3,000,000 in gross proceeds from the sale of debt or equity securities (the Second Amendment). As consideration for the Second Amendment, we agreed to increase the outstanding principal balance of the 2006 Debentures by 10% ($500,000). We evaluated the Second Amendment in the context of EITF 96-19. Pursuant to the guidance of EITF 96-19, the amendment was considered a major modification of the 2006 Debentures as the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the amended debt instrument was greater than 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. As a result, the Second Amendment was considered the issuance of a new debt instrument. We recorded the amended 2006 Debentures at fair value as of the amendment date. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value. The difference between the fair value of the amended 2006 Debentures and the fair value of the 2006 Debentures prior to the amendment was recorded as a loss during the fourth quarter of 2007.
Per the guidance of EITF No. 00-19, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Companys Own Stock (EITF No. 00-19) and EITF No. 05-2, The Meaning of Conventional Convertible Debt Instrument in Issue No. 00-19 (EITF No. 05-2), the anti-dilution features of the 2006 Debentures did not meet the definition of standard anti-dilution features. Therefore, the conversion feature of the 2006 Debentures was considered an embedded derivative in accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS No. 133). Accordingly, we bifurcated the derivative from the 2006 Debentures (host contract) and recorded the liability at its fair value of $2,831,858 with a corresponding entry to debt discount. In connection with the Second Amendment, the outstanding unamortized discount balance of $1,899,747 related to the debt conversion feature was written off. The fair value of the conversion feature of the amended 2006 Debentures was recorded at its fair value of $1,527,389 with a corresponding entry to debt discount. The fair value of the derivative liability was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The difference between the unamortized discount balance associated with the original debt, and the fair value of the conversion feature of the new debt was included in the calculation of loss on extinguishment of debt described above. The debt discount is reflected as a reduction to the 2006 Debentures on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. The debt discount is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the 2006 Debentures.
The 2006 Debenture Warrants also meet the definition of a derivative due to the cashless exercise provision. Accordingly, we bifurcated the derivative from the 2006 Debenture Warrants (host contract) and recorded the liability at its fair value of $1,793,293 with a corresponding entry to debt discount. The 2006 Debenture Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The debt discount is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the remaining life of the 2006 Debentures.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we amortized $264,367 and $925,285, respectively, of debt discount associated with the 2006 Debentures and 2006 Debenture Warrants which is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we amortized $385,428 and $1,156,284, respectively, of debt discount associated with the 2006 Debentures and 2006 Debenture Warrants.
The Agent Warrants also meet the definition of a derivative due to the cashless exercise provision. We recorded a derivative liability at its fair value of $268,230 with a corresponding entry to debt placement costs. The Agent Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We also recorded the cash compensation paid to the placement agents as well as all transaction related costs such as legal and road show expenses as debt placement costs. Debt placement costs, which totaled $938,380, were being amortized on a straight-line basis over the three year life of the 2006 Debentures. In connection with the Second Amendment described above, the outstanding unamortized debt offering cost balance of $629,792 was written off and was included in the loss on extinguishment of debt agreements described above. Accordingly, there has been no amortization of debt placement costs during 2008. There were no offering costs associated with the Second Amendment. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we amortized $78,198 and $234,594, respectively, of debt placement costs which is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
The 2006 Debentures originally required us to execute a third party commercialization transaction for EpiCeram® by
12
June 30, 2007. On June 29, 2007, the investors agreed to extend the date to August 15, 2007 (the First Amendment). As consideration for this amendment, we issued to the investors five year warrants to acquire 400,000 shares of our common stock at an initial exercise price of $2.25 per share (the First Amendment Warrants). All other terms of the warrants are identical to the 2006 Debenture Warrants. Accordingly, they also meet the definition of a derivative. We valued these warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. As a result of several adjustments (most recently the Fourth Amendment), the exercise price of the First Amendment Warrants has been reduced to $.80 per share and the number of common shares underlying the warrants has been increased to 1,125,000.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, $165,000 of accrued interest was added to 2006 Debenture principal balance.
Convertible Notes
In November 2005, we sold in a private transaction an aggregate of $3,200,000 of promissory notes convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $.96 per share, as adjusted (the Convertible Notes). The Convertible Notes accrued interest at the rate of 10% per annum payable quarterly. The Convertible Notes were repayable, principal and outstanding accrued interest, on June 30, 2008.
On June 30, 2008, the holders of the Convertible Notes executed a consent and waiver agreement (the June 2008 Waiver) which extended the maturity date of the Convertible Notes to July 18, 2008 and waived any rights to payment of interest with respect to the notes through July 18, 2008. The purpose of the June 2008 Waiver was to allow sufficient time to complete negotiations and documentation of an additional amendment that would more substantively amend the terms of the debt. We paid no consideration for this amendment.
On September 25, 2008, we executed an amendment agreement which is dated August 20, 2008 and effective July 19, 2008 (the August 2008 Amendment). The August 2008 Amendment modified the Convertible Notes as follows:
· Extended the maturity date of the debt to December 31, 2011;
· Adjusted the conversion price of the debt to $.80 per common share (subject to adjustments described below);
· Increased the interest rate to 12% per annum;
· Deferred payment of accrued interest to June 30, 2009. Accrued interest for the period from July 1, 2008 through March 31, 2009 is to be added to the Convertible Notes principal balance;
· Adjusted the exercise price of the Convertible Note Warrants (defined below) to $.80 per common share (subject to adjustments described below);
· Adjusted the terms of the Convertible Note Warrants so that reductions in the exercise price result in an increase in the number of warrant shares;
· Extended the expiration date of the Convertible Note Warrants to December 31, 2011;
· Established quarterly redemption requirement beginning June 30, 2009 (the Quarterly Redemption Amounts) ;
· Established the Dedicated Revenue Streams as the sole required source for making the Quarterly Redemption Amounts;
· Established 2% liquidate damages for each 30 day period that the holders of the Convertible Notes are not permitted to immediately resell shares of common stock pursuant to Rule 144; and
· Established certain other covenants intended to reduce the Companys cash requirements.
As additional consideration for the August 2008 Amendment, the Company issued new five-year warrants to the holders giving them the right to purchase up to 514,481 shares of the Companys common stock at an initial exercise price of $.80 per share (subject to adjustment) (the August 2008 Amendment Warrants).
In the event that we fail to pay interest in full on any due date, the holder shall have the option to receive the unpaid balance in shares of common stock at a price equal to 85% of the average of the 5 lowest VWAPs during any 30 consecutive trading day periods during the 365 day period immediately prior to the interest payment date or, in lieu of receiving shares of common stock, may add such unpaid interest to the outstanding principal amount of the Convertible Notes.
In the event that we fail to pay the cumulative Quarterly Redemption Amounts during any 12-month period ending June 30th, then the conversion price of the Convertible Notes shall be reduced each July 1st to the lesser of (i) the then conversion price or (ii) the average of the 10 lowest VWAPs for the 60 consecutive trading day period immediately prior.
We evaluated the August 2008 Amendment in the context of EITF 96-19. Based on our analysis, the Fourth Amendment was
13
not considered a major modification of the debt.
During the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded the fair value of the August 2008 Amendment as a charge to interest expense and a corresponding increase to derivative liability on the accompanying condensed financial statements. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value. The fair value of the August 2008 Amendment is comprised of the following:
|
August 2008 Amendment Warrants |
|
$ |
211,966 |
|
|
Reduction in conversion price of Convertible Notes |
|
1,314,553 |
|
|
|
Reduction in exercise price of Convertible Note Warrants |
|
649,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,175,863 |
|
We can force the conversion of the Convertible Notes provided (i) we have registered the common shares underlying the Convertible Notes and (ii) the closing bid price of our common stock has equaled or exceeded $1.60 (as adjusted) for 20 consecutive trading days. However, the Convertible Notes contain a provision that prohibits a holder from converting the note if such conversion would result in the holder owning more than 4.99% of our outstanding common stock at the time of such conversion and certain other restrictions based on the trading volume of our stock. The conversion price of the Convertible Notes was to be adjusted downward if either a default or milestone default (both defined in the agreements) were to occur. However, in order for an adjustment to take place to the conversion price, both (i) a default or milestone default would have to occur and (ii) the volume weighted average price of our common stock for the five days preceding the default (the Five Day VWAP) would have to be less than the stated conversion price. If the Five Day VWAP was less than the conversion price, then the conversion price would be adjusted to the Five Day VWAP. An adjustment to the conversion price due to a default could take place at any time during the year. An adjustment due to a milestone default could only take place on a Reporting Date (the date we file an Annual Report on Form 10-K or a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q). There are no further potential milestone defaults under the Convertible Notes. Our obligation to repay the Convertible Notes is secured by a first lien security interest on all of our tangible and intangible assets.
Upon filing our Form 10-QSB for the periods ended March 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007 and our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, we had milestone defaults and the Five Day VWAP was below the conversion price. Accordingly, the conversion price of the Convertible Notes was reduced from $2.05 per share to $1.92 per share, from $1.92 per share to $1.57 per share, and then from $1.57 per share to $.96 per share. The reduction in conversion price of the Convertible Notes also triggered a reduction in the conversion price of the 2006 Debentures, the 2006 Debenture Warrants and the First Amendment Warrants to $.96 per share. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded $0 and $2,624,629, respectively, for the fair value of the reductions in conversion price resulting from milestone defaults which is included in interest expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations with a corresponding increase to derivative liability. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded $1,271,377 and $1,958,987, respectively, for the fair value of the reductions in conversion price. We determined fair value using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Events of default include failure to pay principal or interest in a timely manner; a breach of a material covenant not cured within 10 days of written notice; a breach of any material representations and warranties; the appointment of a receiver or trustee for a substantial part of our property or business without prior written consent; a money judgment filed against us in excess of $75,000; bankruptcy; a delisting of our common stock; and a stop trade action by the SEC that lasts for more than five consecutive days.
In addition, purchasers of the Convertible Notes received warrants exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 780,488 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.255 per share (the Convertible Note Warrants). As a result of the August 2008 Amendment, the warrant shares have been increased by 1,326,219 shares and the exercise price reduced to $.80 per share (except for 48,780 warrants held by a holder that previously converted all of their Convertible Notes). We also issued to a placement agent and finder, warrants exercisable to purchase an aggregate of 156,098 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.05 per share (the Placement and Finder Warrants) and paid them cash commissions of $320,000.
Per the guidance of EITF No. 00-19 and EITF No. 05-2, the anti-dilution features of the Convertible Notes did not meet the definition of standard anti-dilution features. Therefore, the conversion feature of the Convertible Notes was considered an embedded derivative in accordance with SFAS No. 133. Accordingly, we bifurcated the derivative from the Convertible Notes (host contract) and recorded the liability at its fair value of $1,792,000 with a corresponding entry to debt discount. The fair value of the derivative liability was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The original debt discount was amortized on a straight-line basis over the original two year life of the Convertible Notes.
The Convertible Note Warrants also meet the definition of a derivative due to the cashless exercise provision. Accordingly, we bifurcated the derivative from the Convertible Note Warrants (host contract) and recorded the liability at its fair value of $1,237,073 with a corresponding entry to debt discount. The Convertible Note Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option
14
pricing model. The debt discount was amortized on a straight-line basis over the original two year life of the Convertible Notes.
The Convertible Notes originally matured on November 28, 2007. On November 28, 2007, the holders of the Convertible Notes agreed to amend the terms of the notes to extend the maturity date to June 30, 2008. As consideration for this amendment, we agreed to increase the outstanding principal balance of the Convertible Notes by 10% ($282,017). We evaluated this amendment in the context of EITF 96-19. Pursuant to the guidance of EITF 96-19, the amendment was considered a major modification of the Convertible Notes as the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the amended debt instrument was greater than 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the terms of the original instrument. As a result, the amended Convertible Notes are considered the issuance of a new debt instrument. We recorded the amended Convertible Notes at fair value as of the amendment date. We used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine fair value. The difference between the fair value of the amended Convertible Notes and the fair value of the Convertible Notes prior to the amendment was recorded as a loss during the fourth quarter of 2007.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 we amortized $0 and $428,491, respectively, of debt discount associated with the Convertible Notes and Convertible Note Warrants which is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we amortized $316,249 and $1,007,931, respectively, of debt discount associated with the Convertible Notes and Convertible Note Warrants.
The Placement and Finder Warrants also meet the definition of a derivative due to the cashless exercise provision. We recorded a derivative liability at its fair value of $252,254 with a corresponding entry to debt placement costs. The Placement and Finder Warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We also recorded the cash compensation paid to the placement agent as well as all transaction related expenses such as legal fees as debt placement costs. Debt placement costs, which totaled $610,087, were amortized on a straight-line basis over the original two year life of the Convertible Notes. Accordingly, we did not amortize any debt placement costs during 2008. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we amortized $65,751 and $205,710, respectively, of debt placement costs which is included in interest expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, holders converted $40,000 of accrued interest into 50,000 shares of common stock. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007, holders converted $129,828 of Convertible Notes and $68,669 of accrued interest into 100,000 shares of common stock. Further, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, $55,651 of accrued interest was added to the Convertible Note principal balance.
Maturities of convertible debt are as follows as of September 30, 2008 :
|
Year |
|
Amount |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
2011 |
|
8,822,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
8,822,840 |
|
|
|
Less debt discount |
|
(1,718,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,104,445 |
|
(4) STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
Preferred Stock
Our articles of incorporation authorizes our board of directors (the Board) to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock and allows the Board to determine preferences, conversion and other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to distributions, qualifications, and other terms and conditions.
Series A Preferred Stock
In connection with our merger transaction with Ceragenix Corporation in May 2005, the Board authorized the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock to Osmotics. The issuance of the Preferred Stock was in exchange for identical shares of preferred stock issued by Ceragenix Corporation to Osmotics in January 2005. The Preferred Stock had a stated value of $4.00 per share and accrued dividends at a rate of 6% per annum. In May 2008, all of the Preferred Stock and $240,000 of accrued dividends were converted into 1,304,569 shares of common stock.
15
The original issuance of preferred stock by Ceragenix Corporation to Osmotics was consideration for a technology transfer agreement. The technology transfer agreement was a transaction between entities under common control, and accordingly, Ceragenix Corporation recorded the technology at $0 which was Osmotics historical carrying value. In connection with the Merger recapitalization, we utilized Ceragenix Corporations historical carrying value of the preferred stock. As a result, we recorded a discount on the issuance of the Preferred Stock of $4,000,000.
Series B Preferred Stock
The Board has also authorized the issuance of 375,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock (Series B). Series B has a stated value of $2.25 per share and does not accrue dividends. Series B is convertible into 375,000 shares of the Companys common stock at the option of the holder. In the event of liquidation, Series B ranks junior to Series A and all debt of the Company.
In September 2007, we entered into an agreement with an investor relations firm to provide certain services over a twelve month period. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued 300,000 shares of Series B as consideration for the services. We valued these shares at $675,000 which represents the stated value of the Series B shares that were issued. We recorded a prepaid expense equal to the value of these shares with a corresponding entry to stockholders equity. We amortized the prepaid expense over the life of the agreement. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we amortized $112,500 and $450,000, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
In September 2007, we renewed an agreement with an investor relations firm to provide certain services over a twelve month period. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued 75,000 shares of Series B as consideration for the services. We valued these shares at $168,750 which represents the stated value of the Series B shares that were issued. We recorded a prepaid expense equal to the value of these shares with a corresponding entry to stockholders equity. We amortized the prepaid expense over the life of the agreement. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we amortized $35,156 and $119,531, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
16
Common Stock
In March 2007, we entered into an agreement with an investor relations firm to provide certain services over a six month period. Under the terms of the agreement, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock as consideration for the services. We valued these shares at $122,000 which represents the closing price of our common stock on the date of the agreement multiplied by the number of shares issued. We recorded a prepaid expense equal to the value of these shares with a corresponding entry to additional paid in capital. We amortized the prepaid expense over the life of the agreement. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we amortized $50,833 and $122,000, respectively, which is included in general and administrative expense on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we issued 50,000 shares of common stock upon the conversion of $40,000 of accrued interest. During the nine months ended September 30, 2007 we issued 16,883 shares of common stock, in exchange for $16,883 upon the exercise of certain common stock purchase warrants.
Stock Options
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded compensation expense related to employee stock options of $178,889 and $627,513, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, we recorded compensation expense related to employee stock options of $223,579 and $554,123, respectively. The stock option compensation expense is included in general and administrative expense in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The weighted average fair value of stock options at the date of grant issued to employees during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 was $.36 per share and $1.01 per share, respectively. We used the following assumptions to determine the fair value of stock option grants during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
Volatility |
|
49.6% - 50.5 |
% |
|
Dividend yield |